GENREALITY


March 22nd, 2010 by Carrie Vaughn
Breaking Up is Hard to Do:  Choosing to Leave a Publisher

Sasha’s posts about choices from a couple of weeks ago (here and here) really struck a chord with me, because I think she’s exactly right.  We do control more than the story, and we do have choices when it comes to our careers.  This is why it’s important to actually have a plan for your career.  What would you like your career to look like?  Whose career would you like to emulate?  How do you do that?

Our purpose here at the blog is to talk about some of the gritty realities of working as a writer. One of those realities is the ability to say, “No,” and to walk away from a deal.  When the deal benefits someone else instead of you, the writer, you have to be able to walk away.

I’ve been sitting on this news since last July, because I wanted to wait until the situation progressed a little farther and I saw what kind of fallout there was going to be.  This is really the first place I’ve talked about this in any detail.  Okay, here it goes.

I left my publisher.  When it came time to negotiate a new contract for more Kitty novels with Grand Central last summer, we couldn’t come to an agreement that we were all happy with.  When Grand Central said, essentially, “Take it or leave it,” I left.  And it was as horrible as any breakup.  All the metaphors I come up with are failed relationship metaphors:  All those years we spent together, all the good times and feelings, all wasted now, overshadowed by fighting and ill will.  Was it something I did?  Am I in the wrong here?  And the thought, in hindsight, that maybe I should have left a long time ago.

It’s been very strange, because while lots of us have heard of situations where a publisher drops an author, it’s relatively rare for the author of a successful series to walk away from a deal.  Or for a publisher to let that successful series go.  I haven’t had much of a model to go on, or much of anyone to ask for advice.  When I tell this story to hardened pros, the response I’ve been getting is, “What?  Are they crazy?”

The point of contention here wasn’t money — it was the non-competition clause, which we had argued over before.  I have two stand-alone contemporary fantasy novels I wrote when I was waiting to see if the Kitty series would sell, and I’ve been trying to get those out there.  Grand Central rejected them.  I really wanted to sell them elsewhere.  Grand Central really didn’t want me doing anything under my own name but the Kitty novels.  I really wanted to do them under my own name.  So, it was an issue of control.  I wanted to be able to diversify my career, publish other novels, expand my audience, and so forth.  My agent and I offered compromises, which Grand Central did not accept.

Walking away was not the hardest thing I’ve ever done because Grand Central really didn’t give me a choice.  They had one vision for what my career should be, and I had a different vision.  I had to go with my gut on that one.  For them I was just another author, one of many.  But I only have one me — I am my only business.  I have to look out for my own interests, which I felt Grand Central was not doing in this case.  What was hard was leaving my editor, who I really like and who really knows her stuff, and leaving a publisher that did a good job with the books.  But I have more stories to tell.  My name is worth something right now and I have to strike while the iron is hot.

Why did I wait to tell the news instead of spilling it all over the blogosphere while it was happening?  Lots of reasons (besides the fact that I’m pretty private anyway).

1.    Grand Central still had Kitty’s House of Horrors and my true nightmare scenario was that they would somehow delay its release.  Now, this would have benefited no one, least of all Grand Central.  But remember, I was thinking worse case scenarios here.  Happily, that didn’t happen.  The book came out on schedule and hit the NYT list at #16.  And now my contractual obligations are fulfilled and I can move on.

2.    I had to sell the series to a new publisher.  I’m one of those writers who is superstitious about talking up deals before they’re finalized.  I really didn’t want to air any laundry (much less dirty laundry) before I found a new publisher and established a working relationship with a new editor.  Happily, this is now accomplished.  I turned in Kitty #8, Kitty Goes to War, the first novel on the new contract, in November, and it’ll be due out in July.

3.    Emotion.  Emotions ran really high there for a little while.  The worst thing I could have done was blog while I was in that state of confusion, uncertainty, helplessness, bafflement, etc.  Especially before I knew how it was all going to work out.  (This is also why I think blogging about relationships is a bad idea…)

The Kitty series is now with Tor Books.  How do I feel about having a new home?  Well.  Pretty good, actually.  Tor also bought those two stand-alone novels.  When I pitched the series, I included — and Tor accepted — the Kitty short story collection, gathering all the Kitty and related short stories that have appeared in various publications over the years as well as an original novella.  This is something I’ve been wanting to do for years, and something Grand Central wouldn’t do at all. So, I’m hopeful that I’m now with a publisher that is interested in my whole career rather than one specific series and nothing else.

There’s still uncertainty.  Maybe Grand Central was right, and me branching out and publishing non-Kitty books will tank my career (that’s what I kept getting told, anyway).  Another issue:  Grand Central still has the rights to the backlist, books 1 through 7, as long as they keep them in print.  Which should be a no-brainer — it’s minimal effort income at this point.  But who knows.  But whatever happens, at least I’m following the path I think is right rather than knuckling under.

Related posts:

  1. First Sales
  2. Follow Up
  3. Take it or leave it.

81 comments to “Breaking Up is Hard to Do: Choosing to Leave a Publisher”

  1. Kenneth Mark Hoover
    Comment
    51
     · March 27th, 2010 at 9:10 pm · Link

    FWIW, I think you made the right decision. I wouldn’t let anyone tell me what I could or couldn’t try to sell under my own name. That’s a deal breaker right there as far as I’m concerned.



  2. Sean P Fodera
    Comment
    52
     · March 27th, 2010 at 10:31 pm · Link

    Carrie

    I worked on behalf of Tor to negotiate your new contract with your agent. If I may say so, it was worth every minute it took to make this deal happen. We are thrilled to have you with us.



  3. S. J. Day
    Comment
    53
     · April 2nd, 2010 at 11:37 am · Link

    Good for you, Carrie! I’ve been at the crossroads you describe, and I have several friends who’ve faced similar ultimatums in the last year or so. I’m baffled by the choices some publishers make to hedge their bets, but I’m so proud of authors who stand up for themselves and their careers. I wish you all the best.



  4. Julius Lester
    Comment
    54
     · April 5th, 2010 at 11:20 am · Link

    Congratulations on standing your ground on the non-competition clause. I tell publishers that I will agree to a non-competition clause if they add that they will not sell a book that will compete with mine. No publisher has agreed to this, of course, but, so far, each has agreed to strike the non-competition clause. If ever a publisher refuses to strike the non-competition clause, that’s a deal breaker. You made the right decision for yourself.

    Julius Lester



  5. Daniel Reitz
    Comment
    55
     · April 5th, 2010 at 3:13 pm · Link

    “Maybe Grand Central was right, and me branching out and publishing non-Kitty books will tank my career (that’s what I kept getting told, anyway)”

    I don’t think I’d worry about this. While I love Kitty books, and will look for many more, the reason I love them is that you write them. So if your name is on the book, that’s reason enough to buy it.



  6. Darynda Jones
    Comment
    56
     · May 11th, 2010 at 7:04 pm · Link

    I just found this, Carrie, and really, really enjoyed it. Thank you so much for the insight into the little-known, mysterious world of publishing. A friend of mine is at Tor and just loves them. Good luck with everything!



  7. Andrew Zack
    Comment
    57
     · March 9th, 2011 at 3:10 pm · Link

    Reading just this one post, I have to say I’m a bit astounded. As an agent, I’ve never had a problem getting a publisher to compromise on a non-compete clause. In your case, I’d be shocked if they would not have agreed to simply have the option clause and the non-complete clause not apply to works they had rejected.

    Additionally, while Tor is a great publisher, its boilerplate is in no way comparable to the Grand Central boilerplate and I would be extremely interested to see how your royalties from Tor compare to your royalties from Grand Central over time. From a contracts point-of-view, I would always choose Grand Central.

    A.



    • Carrie Vaughn
      Comment
      57.1
       · March 9th, 2011 at 6:33 pm · Link

      Hi Andrew,

      Grand Central would not strike the clause or adjust it. We asked them to, many times. In fact, they made efforts to control the publishing schedule *with a different publisher* of the books they rejected. We negotiated for almost six months. As I said, this was not a step I took lightly. My agent would agree with you — he’d never had a problem, either. Until this case.

      In the two years since this happened, these kinds of problems have become more and more common. Most of the major publishers have changed their boilerplate contracts in an attempt to exert more control over author identities.

      Contracts can always be negotiated, so you should not assume I signed the Tor boilerplate without adjustments. Also, royalties are not the only consideration when signing a contract — in this case, control of my career, what I published, and the use of my very name were at stake.



  8. Brian M. Scott
    Comment
    58
     · December 3rd, 2011 at 7:52 pm · Link

    (This is very late, but the post was only just brought to my attention.) From my point of view the folks at Grand Central couldn’t have been more wrong: I like the Kitty books, but I thought that Discord’s Apple was a real step up — more ambitious, and at least as well done.



    • Carrie V.
      Comment
      58.1
       · December 6th, 2011 at 12:19 pm · Link

      Thanks — that means a lot. In hindsight, I realize the things they were telling me about the new books had nothing to do with the books, but were about what they wanted to get from me.

      Discord’s Apple ended up getting a starred review from Publishers Weekly.

      The transition seems to have gone well, so far!



  9. Andy Gavin
    Comment
    59
     · February 21st, 2012 at 7:08 pm · Link

    It’s astounding that publishers have the nerve to even consider non-compete clauses of this sort. They are positively medieval in an “edicts of Diocletian” sort of way. It’s one thing to pay for exclusivity or request a fair right of first offer, but another entirely to try and nix projects which they themselves pass on. Good for you not putting up with it.



Trackbacks/Pingbacks

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting